Chaplaincy and Spiritual Leadership

One part of the "something else" which chaplains offer the Army family is sometimes described as “spiritual leadership,” to distinguish it from what chaplains do for their religious constituencies. Over the last two decades, the Army has talked about “spiritual fitness” or “spiritual readiness.” The word “spiritual” is both helpful and problematic.

For many people, "spiritual" is a broader and more inclusive word than religion. The use of the word "spiritual," however, has proved to be offensive to both the non-religious - who would never use the word - and to some who are deeply religious - who understand the word "spiritual" to be filled with specific theological content. To many, "spiritual" and "religious" are synonyms. There is, in fact, no religious understanding of spirituality that is common across ecclesiastical boundaries. I'm not sure there is a way for the government to talk about spirituality in a way that some won't find intolerant and others won't find idolatrous.

Perhaps we need another word entirely.

<!--more-->

Currently, the Army is emphasizing “resiliency," and the chaplain's work plays a role for many in developing the trait. Previous generations of chaplains talked about “moral leadership” or “character development.”

Each of these terms has its strengths and limitations. Each attempts to recognize that military virtues such as fitness, readiness, resiliency, leadership, character have an intangible human dimension to them.

Similarly, the word “spiritual” gets at the intangible human dimension, but as we have seen, it implies much more.

What then is this "something else" that chaplains offer all members of the Army? Army doctrine says that the chaplaincy's core competencies are these.
  • Nurture the living.
  • Care for the wounded.
  • Honor the dead.
Nurturing human life, caring for those who hurt and honoring the dignity of every human being: these are what every chaplain does for every member of the Army family. These comprise the ethos of the Army chaplaincy. More on that tomorrow.

Popular posts from this blog

If My People

Performative civil religion was on full display this week during the America Reads the Bible series of public Bible readings. The performance is supposed to commemorate the 250th anniversary of America’s Declaration of Independence. During the event, a series of politicians, MAGA supporters, and other ostensibly notable figures will read aloud the entire Protestant Bible in piecemeal fashion. The readers are using the King James Easy Read Bible, one of many obscure revisions of the KJV. The live readings take place at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, D.C. Tickets are $50. You can also register to watch a live stream. I cannot understood why anyone thinks merely reading the words of the Bible aloud will mean anything to God, have a positive effect on the nation, or draw anyone to Jesus. On Tuesday, President Trump read from Second Chronicle. The organizer's website features a recording of the president's reading on the home page of it's website and declares, As...
Read more

The Problem with Religious Affiliation Codes

Religious preference codes only exist to give commanders and chaplains a big, one-over-the-world view of the religious needs of the unit as a whole. They reside in the big Army database of personnel records as useful data points for generalized planning. They are not terribly useful for individual religious support where people don't always fit their labels. There, chaplains need to get to know their soldiers personally.  Soldiers entering the Army are overwhelmed by an avalanche of administrative requirements. It’s a normal human response to proceed through that process without much thought.  I found that Soldiers had often chosen their religious preference codes hastily, and the religion coded in the personnel database did not accurately reflect their religious identities.  The previous list of religious codes was long (5 single spaced pages) and not logically organized. It was a jumble of institutional identities and religious categories, most of which were going to be...
Read more

Is the President Saving Religion?

The president spoke to the National Prayer Breakfast on February 6, 2026. The event is sponsored by a Christian organization, but its official website says that it is open to people of all faiths. It is supposed to bring national leaders of faith together regardless of political affiliation.  As a Christian pastor, I would like to respectfully offer some reflections on the president’s 77 minute speech. This essay is long because the speech was long. What’s In the Speech What was the tone of the speech? Uplifting? Inspiring? Unifying? Spiritual? I would characterize it as political. It’s tone matched the tone of all his speeches, if you know what I mean. Most of it echoed themes and talking points common to every speech he makes. Little of it had any bearing on on the purpose of the assembly, and I can’t begin to address those parts of the speech. Simply put, I found much of it objectionable.  But what about the rest, the parts that talked about religion? In over 12...
Read more